This image is the top of the content box. Unfortunately, there is no information-based reason for this div to be here. It's just here for design reasons. Sorry.
Home Forums Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to the misticriver forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Tags:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old July 9th, 2007, 06:55 PM
Newbie Floating Down The Mistic River
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 19
cx 300 or e3c

Ive decided to upgrade my earphones to get better sound from my T10, since now im using sennheisers mx450, which i think cannot be regarded as ,,high-ends´´. So im choosing between these: sennheiser cx 300 and shure e3c/e2c. Yes, there is a pretty big difference in price, but as for QUALITY, im not sure at all. Some ppl say there is no bass in shures, and some say tha lack of bass is caused by the bad usage. I dont require exceptionally strong bass, but I think there should be some. Of course I require overall sound quality, not only a good bass. Do u have any experience with both of them? If so, Id appreciate some advice.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old July 10th, 2007, 03:44 AM
monkeyball's Avatar
Hoping For A Cool Title
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 57
i'd go for the cx 300's. I use them whenever travelling with my clix.

The main selling point is that they are very minimalistic in design. Basically all there is is the speaker 'blub' then a rubbery part to protect the wire. Very good for travelling and also very durable.

cons of the cx 300's are that they don't come with cases (however you don't really need them) and that the wire is a bit short and sends tugging sounds into your ears if they're tugged in any way while you use them.

i hope that helped
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old July 10th, 2007, 02:38 PM
Newbie Floating Down The Mistic River
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 19
thanks

Yes, it helped. Thank you. I have also checked all the forums once again, and found that most ppl really prefer the senns, for the reason I mentioned in my first thread. And I also guess that CXs will be more comfortable, since I dont need to stick them so deep into my ear. Maybe Ill also buy senns px100, but Im not all sure yet.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old July 10th, 2007, 08:39 PM
monkeyball's Avatar
Hoping For A Cool Title
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Specops View Post
Yes, it helped. Thank you. I have also checked all the forums once again, and found that most ppl really prefer the senns, for the reason I mentioned in my first thread. And I also guess that CXs will be more comfortable, since I dont need to stick them so deep into my ear. Maybe Ill also buy senns px100, but Im not all sure yet.
they're also quite good. my mate james uses them. however you need to consider what kind if user you are.

I carry my clix in my pocket all day so i prefer ear buds. However he just packs up his ipod and puts his px100 into its carry case.

the px100 sounds better i think, however it's hard to tell.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old July 12th, 2007, 05:14 PM
Newbie Floating Down The Mistic River
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 19
Thx for your advice, but I forgot to ask you about the cable length. I know that the right cable is longer than the left one. Isnt it uncomfortable? I also suppose that you have to put the longer cable around your neck. How do you feel?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old July 13th, 2007, 06:09 PM
monkeyball's Avatar
Hoping For A Cool Title
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 57
i prefer the neck chain variants of ear buds. I listen to music when i work in the library (final year at school) so then i don't get distracted by anyone. They're handy because you can hang them off your shoulders when you're not using them.

i find that with the regular Y shaped earbuds i have no where to put them when i'm in a situation where i need to stop listening for a moment but am going to start listening again soon. if you know what i mean...

my main problem with the cx300 earbuds is that they're a bit short. I'm only 171cm and putting my clix in my pocket usually leaves a small amount of wire which is slack.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old July 14th, 2007, 05:03 AM
Newbie Floating Down The Mistic River
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 25
I only found two drawbacks on CX300 (which I've been using for few months already):
1. short wires - you can't carry your player in lower pockets
2. asymetrical wires - even worse, the right wire is twice as long as it should be (at least in my case)

If you can live with these (I can) then I guess you'll be pleased with your CX300s (as I am).
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old July 14th, 2007, 09:31 AM
Newbie Floating Down The Mistic River
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 12
Two suggestions for the CX300:
1. Run the wires over the top of and behind the ears. This helps eliminate microphonics, i.e. noise from tugging the wires.
2. Run the longer right hand wire behind the head.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old July 15th, 2007, 12:37 AM
monkeyball's Avatar
Hoping For A Cool Title
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by rex52 View Post
Two suggestions for the CX300:
1. Run the wires over the top of and behind the ears. This helps eliminate microphonics, i.e. noise from tugging the wires.
2. Run the longer right hand wire behind the head.
yeah... i suppose but i'll have to rebut that:
1. you'll look like a complete tool if you do that.
2. that's blatantly obvious! it's just that some people don't realise what "neck chain" means.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old July 15th, 2007, 11:10 AM
Newbie Floating Down The Mistic River
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 19
2. Yes, its unsusual to run the wires over the top of and behind the ears, but see that many earphones are constructed to be used in this way-e.g. Shure or Ultimate Ears super.fi 3.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old July 15th, 2007, 10:43 PM
monkeyball's Avatar
Hoping For A Cool Title
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 57
it's the way they're made and you should accept it *glare*

nah i kid. just do what you want however i do find it strange that some people people don't know how those ear buds are designed to be worn.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
This image is the bottom of the content box. Unfortunately, there is no information-based reason for this div to be here. It's just here for design reasons. Sorry.