This image is the top of the content box. Unfortunately, there is no information-based reason for this div to be here. It's just here for design reasons. Sorry.
Go Back   MisticRiver :: For iriver Enthusiasts > iRiver HD, CDP's and PMP's > iMP Series
Home Forums Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to the misticriver forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Tags:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old July 26th, 2007, 09:53 AM
Newbie Floating Down The Mistic River
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 15
Ogg Bit Converter

Does anyone know if using the Ogg Bit Converter to convert existing ogg files results in a loss of sound quality?

I'm listening to my converted 96kpbs ogg files now (they were already encoded to 96 but i had to further convert them using the bit converter else they wouldn't play in Slimx 350).

I absolutely freakin adore the clean clear sound of OGG.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old July 26th, 2007, 10:52 AM
Step666's Avatar
Everything looks perfect from far away.
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Home, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 8,108
Any form of transcoding will result in a loss in quality.
You're always better off re-ripping if possible
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old July 28th, 2007, 01:06 AM
Newbie Floating Down The Mistic River
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 15
Yes, I thought as much. I ended up re-ripping the CD and adjusting the OGG bitrate to 112 - now they play fine

I'm really loving the sound of OGG. I knew of it but never really delved into it - it sounds just incredible compared to MP3 - more punchy bass and better soundscape (at least with using my Yuin PK1's)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old July 28th, 2007, 04:54 PM
Newbie Floating Down The Mistic River
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 15
I experimented with encoding further and got the iMP-350 to play my 96kpbs oggs on first go (w/o having to transcode using Ogg bitrate converter)....I use OggDropXPD and in the encoding options use ABR mode, min. bitrate = 96kpbs, nom. bitrate = 96kpbs, max. bitrate = 500kpbs. It works like a charm.

I still use the Ogg Bitrate Converter to check if my files are compatible with the slimx, so it's useful in that way.

But, there are still some issues...sometimes when playing an album sequentially (in iMP-350), the player sometimes skips songs that have no issue with them. I use CD-RW almost exclusively so it might be a matter of just changing to a regular CD-R.

Also - and this one is annoying...the player sometimes powers itself off and reboots randomly. It could be a question of bitrate, or seeking speed, I don't know...will keep posted.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old August 1st, 2007, 04:40 PM
Eager Mistic Beaver
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Poland, Cracow
Posts: 446
actually it is pointless to use iriver's "ogg converter" as what it does is to decode OGG file to PCM stream and encode it again with another "average bitrate" setting with OLD Ogg Vorbis Encoder

which is bad because:
- it is re-encoding, which means "twice as compressed, twice as much artifacts"
- file size is actually bigger than it could be (because of average bitrate ie. 100kbps instead od 98kbps)
- you can use new (providing better sound quality) encoder (say aoTuV relase 1), but you still re-encode hi-quality file with old and bulk "vorbis pre-1.0 beta" encoder

far better is to use more strict settings at the first encoding ie. "average bitrate" set to 100kbps to ensure full compatibility with iMP but sacrificing those 4kbps

the only program capable of "bitrate peeling" (say "without re-encoding" change of bitrate) is "bpeel"... but it only decreases bitrate (ie. 250 -> 220kbps for iFP series) and not increases (in terms of quality it would not be as pointless as re-encoding, but still it will be like "padding with zeroes")... and in fact is capable of reducing bitrate as far as ~0.8 times original bitrate... and - in fact - speaking of quality, it would be better to encode once more from CD-Audio than to peel some bitrate off
__________________
I sold H140 and bought Rio Karma :]

Last edited by KHRoN : August 1st, 2007 at 04:45 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
This image is the bottom of the content box. Unfortunately, there is no information-based reason for this div to be here. It's just here for design reasons. Sorry.