This image is the top of the content box. Unfortunately, there is no information-based reason for this div to be here. It's just here for design reasons. Sorry.
Home Forums Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to the misticriver forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old January 23rd, 2004, 04:18 AM
Newbie Floating Down The Mistic River
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 15
Max CD-R size for iMPs?

Hi all, anyone using 90 or 99 min CD-R with their iMP?

Can anyone confirm or deny that these discs are read by the player?

If you have had some success with these, please post length in mins, brand of disc, burning software and iMP models.

Thanks!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old January 24th, 2004, 03:31 PM
Hoping For A Cool Title
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 71
I have used a 99 min CD-R for my iMP-350, but I ran into problems with tracks at the start and end of the CD. They still played, but the player was struggling to read it, and it couldn't be good for the battery with all the seeking....

However, with a 90 min CD-R, I had more reliable results, but with a 80 min, it was 100%.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old January 25th, 2004, 05:13 AM
Mistic Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 989
I agree, 90/99 minute cdrs will be quite hard to read on the imp's, but I had no problems at all with slightly overburned 80 minute discs with the imp-550.

- Odie
__________________
Current: Shure E2c/Beyer Dynamic DT770 + PA2V2 + SE W950i Walkman Phone
Reviewed: iFP-990 (256mb)
Former Players: iRiver H340, iMP-550, iHP-120, iHP-140, iFP-1095, iFP-990 | 2GB iRiver S10
iAudio4 | iAudio5 | MSC H-64 | Panasonic SLMP30 | 60GB 5G iPod | 4GB iPod Nano (1G) | 4GB Meizu MiniPlayer
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old January 27th, 2004, 01:35 AM
Newbie Floating Down The Mistic River
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 15
Is it even remotely possible that support for these discs could be introduced through a firmware update?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old January 27th, 2004, 02:50 AM
Mistic Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 989
It's probably unlikely, I think it's all dependent on the laser assembly, and how far that lets the laser read.

I remember back when people released 80 minute cdrs, there was one or two cd players that couldn't even play them!

- Odie
__________________
Current: Shure E2c/Beyer Dynamic DT770 + PA2V2 + SE W950i Walkman Phone
Reviewed: iFP-990 (256mb)
Former Players: iRiver H340, iMP-550, iHP-120, iHP-140, iFP-1095, iFP-990 | 2GB iRiver S10
iAudio4 | iAudio5 | MSC H-64 | Panasonic SLMP30 | 60GB 5G iPod | 4GB iPod Nano (1G) | 4GB Meizu MiniPlayer
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old January 28th, 2004, 01:25 AM
Newbie Floating Down The Mistic River
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 15
Ah well, thats a pity, but if its hardware related there's not much to expect.

If a portable disc player with DVD+/-R/RW compatibility is ever released by iriver I think I'll have to have it!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old February 1st, 2004, 06:15 PM
More MIA than iSS !
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,453
To be quite frank about it, the only supported CD-R/CD-RW types for the whole iMP series up to the 550 is 700Mb (80mins).

So having probs with 90/99 mins stuff is only to be expected - as this really will only work (after a fashion) for some decks that happen to be super sharp in their tolerences.

And dont forget, burning speed is an issue to account for as much the need for good media when you want the best read performance out the decks.

You could say, along with my anti-shock testing and also abusing iMP's as compressed audio sources for supplying on demand audio in broadcasting, i've kinda been there and done it with the tolerence discover of the older iMP's (250 being the benchmark where ASP was considered to be spot on for performance and early 350's likewise).

FG

*notorious imp killer .. may his fur fall out as a pennace for such crimes*
__________________
Has anybody seen me ? If so, please call: 867-5309 and file a missing burnt cat report !
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Size of cd players? leeraff iMP Series 7 January 3rd, 2005 06:38 AM
size of the player jon62690 iriver H1xx Series 1 May 19th, 2004 09:34 PM
Size limitations while recording Raymond iriver H1xx Series 3 February 1st, 2004 06:10 PM
scrolling with joystick/text size drunkendragon116 iriver H1xx Series 5 January 21st, 2004 10:21 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
This image is the bottom of the content box. Unfortunately, there is no information-based reason for this div to be here. It's just here for design reasons. Sorry.