|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Welcome to the misticriver forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
January 30th, 2005, 01:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
AntiShock in iMP-900 vs iMP-550
Hello
I'd like to ask if CD AntiShock in imp-900 is better (or worse) than in previous model imp-550. In manuals it stands that: Imp-900: 40 sec. or 160 sec. (worse sound quality), mp3 always 480 sec., 64 MB buffor (?) Imp-550: 80 sec. or 320 sec. (worse sound quality), mp3 always 900 sec., 16 MB buffor (?) Ask Alice gives me a different information: 160 sec. all these models. So I'm confused. I'm going to listen to cd audio (rarely mp3) and want to have the best skip protection but not worse sound quality. In addition both models have a iRiver ShockFree function that supposedly gives additional skip protection (but with worse sound quality?). Could one tell me which one is better ? Best regard     
|
|
Linear Mode
