This image is the top of the content box. Unfortunately, there is no information-based reason for this div to be here. It's just here for design reasons. Sorry.
Home Forums Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to the misticriver forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Tags:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old May 14th, 2007, 12:46 AM
Newbie Floating Down The Mistic River
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 40
iRiver Going Back to Ogg

Anyone else remember when the H10 was coming out, and the controversy where iRiver was dropping Ogg? Looks like iRiver has come back home and back on the Ogg bandwagon again with it's last few products. The Clix2 even supports UMS in addition to MTP out of the box, furthering the geek appeal of iRiver.

I remember see a quick video clip where some iRiver rep show showing the Clix2 on CNet. He said something along the lines of, "we've learned our lesson in offering which features the customers want". I only vaguely remember that this was in reference to including UMS and Ogg. Has anyone here seen a decent interview where someone from iRiver discusses why they went back to supporting Ogg??

Or, really if they could just link me to that CNet video I remember seeing, I'd appreciate it. It wasn't the one with the current review of the Clix2. It was one back before the Clix2 was released. The iRiver guy was showing off changing the firmware between UMS and MTP and saying how it reformats the drive when you do that. I believe it was a video on CNet's site back during CES of this year. I just looked all over CNet's site and couldn't find it. But, I'm not very familiar with that site.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old May 14th, 2007, 04:32 AM
clieos's Avatar
Maximum Operating Depth
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: +60
Posts: 2,027
Send a message via ICQ to clieos Send a message via AIM to clieos Send a message via MSN to clieos Send a message via Yahoo to clieos
If I remember correctly (and I might be wrong), that Rep. is actually referring to the inclusion of UMS<-> MTP, charging selection and standard USB connection of clix2 (in comparison to clix1). Those features are what been requested the most by clix users.

As of Ogg support, E10, U10 (two generation before clix2) and clix1 (the generation before clix2) have all supported Ogg up to Q10 (*just to name a few of the newer models). Since U10 was released back in late 2005, it really doesn't make sense to claim that iriver is 'going' back to Ogg now. If they did drop Ogg support on H10 (which was also released on mid~late 2005), than they already pick it up again in the same year.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old May 14th, 2007, 06:19 PM
Newbie Floating Down The Mistic River
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 40
Maybe a better title would have been "Went back to Ogg".

In any event, when the H10 came out, it was a big publicity event. Bill Gates stood up at CES holding an H10. When it came out, that was what most of the attention and sales efforts by iRiver was about. This thread here at misticriver shows jeff's interpretation of where iRiver was going. Posts #21 and #23 summing it up nicely. I didn't agree when he said it, but further research on my part over the next month made me decide that jeff was right, that was where iRiver wanted to go, at the time.

It's weird you remember the players from back then that weren't as popular, but that you don't remember what was the big deal back then...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old May 14th, 2007, 06:28 PM
Step666's Avatar
Everything looks perfect from far away.
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Home, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 8,160
So, to summarise, the H10 didn't have OGG.

Not a surprise, it wasn't all that wonderful a player - a huge step back from the previous players in a number of ways, many of which were far more important than the support for one particular codec.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old May 15th, 2007, 03:33 AM
Newbie Floating Down The Mistic River
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 40
Well, it didn't have OGG, or UMS so you have to have Windows to use it. Those were the two reasons I didn't buy it. And it's what the other people who were complaining about the H10 in the thread I pointed to above were also saying.

No one's seen any more in-depths comments than that CNet video by iRiver about why it decided it was a mistake to drop UMS and OGG? This is really why I started the thread, to see if I could find any good media coverage of why iRiver has stopped making devices that don't have UMS and OGG.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old May 15th, 2007, 04:19 AM
Step666's Avatar
Everything looks perfect from far away.
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Home, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 8,160
It didn't have aline-in; it didn't have a line-out; it wasn't initially available in a decent capacity and when the 20GB came out, it was the same size as the H320, which kind of defeats the point of a player that was meant to be small.
There's probably more reasons than that as to why it was a crappy player, I just can't think of them right now.

As for why they did it, who knows?
And, to be honest, who cares? What's done is done.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old May 15th, 2007, 08:34 AM
Newbie Floating Down The Mistic River
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Step666 View Post
As for why they did it, who knows?
And, to be honest, who cares? What's done is done.
Ummm, Step... Is there a reason why you're posting in a thread to say you don't care about what the original poster is asking? Here's some advice: SKIP TO THE NEXT THREAD!! Doing that usually helps most people from throwing little temper tantrums in public places...

The reason it is important (to some people, yes I know - not yourself) is that dropping these technologies and then picking them back up means that there are most likely market forces telling them to do so. It suggests that maybe MTP, which is a Windows-only protocol, is not good enough for a portable devices. This being news because not only are the techno-geeks who hang out in places like MisticRiver wanting options to be able to use desktops other than Microsoft's, but that there are enough people in the general market who wants these options to provide economic incentives for companies to offer them. E.g., maybe it isn't such a good idea just to ignore non-Microsoft desktops when you make a portable device.

And, if OGG was also re-introduced due to market forces, it suggests more companies would be better off providing OGG on their products.

That was the interest, hoping someone knew where iRiver was talking about the why's and wherefor's of including OGG and UMS on their mainstream players these days...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old May 15th, 2007, 08:46 AM
Eager Mistic Beaver
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 287
Interesting.........
__________________
Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophium totam suffodiant = May false logic undermine your entire philosophy
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old May 15th, 2007, 08:51 AM
Step666's Avatar
Everything looks perfect from far away.
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Home, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 8,160
Have you ever considered the possibility that the reason they dropped OGG on the H10 was they were a bunch of idiots and that the H10 is the biggest fark-up in the history of the company?

There's no conspiracy, no pressure from MS, iRiver were just stupid, that's all.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old May 15th, 2007, 04:22 PM
Newbie Floating Down The Mistic River
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Step666 View Post
There's no conspiracy, no pressure from MS, iRiver were just stupid, that's all.
Great, we have a troll. No one said anything about a conspiracy. If you're going to troll, can you at least say something funny?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old May 15th, 2007, 04:42 PM
Step666's Avatar
Everything looks perfect from far away.
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Home, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 8,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by Levander View Post
If you're going to troll, can you at least say something funny?
Sure, right after you ask a question that isn't pointless.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old May 15th, 2007, 06:22 PM
Mistically rockin' in the free world!
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Golden, Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,599
Send a message via AIM to gorcorps Send a message via Yahoo to gorcorps
Quote:
Originally Posted by Levander View Post
Great, we have a troll. No one said anything about a conspiracy. If you're going to troll, can you at least say something funny?
Actually I'm being quite entertained by how personal you're taking this all. It was just a heated discussion, and then you go all personal. Tehehe... classic
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old May 15th, 2007, 06:40 PM
BBD's Avatar
BBD BBD is offline
The Great and Powerful Bloviatrix, esq.
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Harvard Graduate School of Flameology
Posts: 3,441
Send a message via AIM to BBD Send a message via Yahoo to BBD
"Something funny." And--as I was typing that, I was also saying it out loud--to no one--except the 38 other voices in my head that get pissed off when BBD monopolizes the medication!

Which also explains why iRiver abandoned OGG for a short time...

Don't MAKE me come back and ruin this!!!
__________________
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old August 18th, 2007, 01:10 AM
Newbie Floating Down The Mistic River
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Levander View Post
This thread here at misticriver shows jeff's interpretation of where iRiver was going. Posts #21 and #23 summing it up nicely. I didn't agree when he said it, but further research on my part over the next month made me decide that jeff was right, that was where iRiver wanted to go, at the time.
I'm afraid I have to agree that, sadly, the people who value ease of use over freedom of use and actual features outspend us, which makes the irivers and cowons all the more laudable.

Last edited by BadEmu : August 18th, 2007 at 01:25 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
This image is the bottom of the content box. Unfortunately, there is no information-based reason for this div to be here. It's just here for design reasons. Sorry.