View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old June 8th, 2004, 04:43 AM
seadzz seadzz is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boca Raton
Posts: 2,507
Send a message via AIM to seadzz Send a message via Yahoo to seadzz
I have to agree with ya FG. This test only proves that people with nothing better to do picked that version of ogg to sound better than other codecs at 128 kbps. There is nothing implied that at 128 k this or any other codec sounds CD-like.

The results are meaningless in any other context.

Since to my ears every codec sounds like a walkietalkie at 128 I have elected something a bit higher for my own personal use (-q8 ogg, aprox 256 kbps vbr)

jmho

sdz
__________________
"Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it has to be us." Jerry Garcia-Grateful Dead
Reply With Quote