View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old July 5th, 2006, 06:50 AM
traut traut is offline
Eager Mistic Beaver
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 287
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dunno View Post
I would stay with ID3 v2.3 tags as most gizmos are able to read v2.3, whereas v2.4 has limited support and is from a technical standard inferior to v2.3
I agree about the limited support.

But what do you mean by inferior? I thought the main difference of v2.3 to v2.4 is UTF-8 support - especially for the main focus of iRiver for the Asian market this looks like a major improvement to me!?

Otherwise, http://www.id3.org/id3v2.4.0-changes.txt does not look that much inferior?

For the moment, v2.3 would be good enough - but iriver plus doest not even support the full v2.3 range (such as sorting by TCOM!?)
Reply With Quote